Read the method ↗
RUG PULL CASE STUDIES

Follow the evidence.
Learn the pattern.

Explore the timeline, public record and warning signals behind a documented case.

Explore the case library ↓
CASE FILEEvidence first
◎ Public record⌁ Warning signals
THE CASE LIBRARY

Start with the record.

Browse the published case studies below.

A WAY TO READ THE EVIDENCE

From what happened
to what you can learn.

Use these four questions as you read. Expand a step for context.

01

Timeline

What happened, and when?

Read context
Keep event dates separate from the date a study was written or reviewed. Follow the sequence before drawing a conclusion.
02

Public record

What supports the account?

Read context
Check the linked source, its date and the distinction between a reported claim, an allegation and a documented finding.
03

Signals

What was visible at the time?

Read context
Separate historical evidence from a retrospective interpretation. A current assessment cannot establish what a tool would have returned years earlier.
04

Lessons

What can you check next?

Read context
Use the case as a learning aid alongside the methodology and its limitations. No signal or case study guarantees a token’s safety.
ABOUT THIS LIBRARY

Context makes
the case useful.

StableHub forensic case studies of major rug pull events. Each study documents the timeline, the public record, the on-chain signals visible in advance, and how the Rug Risk Score would have graded the token.

The hub’s original description refers to retrospective grading. Read that as a framework discussion, not proof that a live tool predicted a historical event. The interactive checker and token-page publisher also have different data scopes.

About the study and its scope

This hub provides browsing and reading guidance. Each linked study has its own sources and review date; read its factual, legal and scoring claims in that context.

CONTINUE YOUR RESEARCH

Turn a lesson into
a better question.

Explore StableHub

Manage cookies
Scroll to Top