Check a token ↗
TOKEN SAFETY REPORT bnb

Is Audiera safe?

BEAT · Token · CoinGecko: audiera

bnb contract0xcf3232b85b43bca90e51d38cc06cc8bb8c8a3e36
Last updated: Data: CoinGecko, Etherscan
THE QUICK ANSWER

More concerns. Take a closer look.

Audiera (BEAT) has a Rug Risk Score of 75, placing it at a HIGH risk level. This score is primarily driven by the unverified smart contract, which is a major red flag as it means the code hasn’t been independently audited or confirmed by experts. Additionally, the lack of data on token age and top holder concentration raises concerns about transparency and potential manipulation. The token’s presence on multiple major exchanges might suggest legitimacy, but unverified contracts often hide risks like hidden minting functions or backdoors. Beginners should be cautious, as unverified contracts can lead to sudden losses if the project turns out to be fraudulent. This means you should thoroughly research further or avoid investing until the contract is verified. Token age, market activity, exchange information, contract verification and holder concentration have different coverage and limitations. Missing data stays unavailable rather than becoming a reassuring zero. Reported 24-hour volume is a liquidity proxy, not liquidity-pool depth or locked funds. Raw top-10 holder data can include exchange custody wallets and does not identify beneficial owners. Read each signal and its source before drawing conclusions. A lower risk assessment cannot guarantee safety, predict future conduct or remove market risk. Use this report to guide further research, not as a recommendation to buy or sell.

Look at the underlying signals ↓
PRICE · USD$8.21
MARKET CAP · USD$2.40B
24H TRADING VOLUME · USD$93.46M

Market context
CoinGecko snapshot
Volume is not pool depth.

FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE

Risk signals, at a glance.

Value, evaluation and threshold. Open a signal for context.

Token age

UnavailableAge sources vary

THRESHOLDPASS ≥365d · WARN 90–364d · FAIL <90d

— N/A
Why it matters

History is context, not a guarantee. Unknown age stays unavailable; zero days is a real value.

Source: Age sources vary

Trading activity

$93.46MCoinGecko · 24h volume

THRESHOLDPASS ≥$500k · WARN $50k–<$500k · FAIL <$50k

✓ PASS
Why it matters

Reported 24-hour volume is a liquidity proxy, not pool depth, locked liquidity or guaranteed exit liquidity.

Source: CoinGecko · 24h volume

Top-10 holders

UnavailableMoralis · Ethereum only

THRESHOLDPASS ≤30% · WARN >30–50% · FAIL >50%

— N/A
Why it matters

Raw top-10 addresses may include exchange custody wallets. They do not necessarily identify beneficial owners or insiders.

Source: Moralis · Ethereum only

Contract verification

UnavailableEtherscan · Ethereum

THRESHOLDPASS verified · FAIL unverified · N/A outside coverage

— N/A
Why it matters

Verification makes source code inspectable. It is not a security audit. Native coins and unsupported coverage are not a verified-contract pass.

Source: Etherscan · Ethereum

Exchange listings

UnavailableCoinGecko · trading venues

THRESHOLDPASS named tier-1 venue · WARN other listing · FAIL none

— N/A
Why it matters

Listings are not endorsements. Named tier-1 venues in this display rule: Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, OKX, Bybit and KuCoin. Legacy placeholder text cannot establish a listing.

Source: CoinGecko · trading venues
Compare all signal data
Token risk signals and data coverage
SignalValueEvaluationThreshold
Token ageAge sources varyUnavailable— N/APASS ≥365d · WARN 90–364d · FAIL <90d
Trading activityCoinGecko · 24h volume$93.46M✓ PASSPASS ≥$500k · WARN $50k–<$500k · FAIL <$50k
Top-10 holdersMoralis · Ethereum onlyUnavailable— N/APASS ≤30% · WARN >30–50% · FAIL >50%
Contract verificationEtherscan · EthereumUnavailable— N/APASS verified · FAIL unverified · N/A outside coverage
Exchange listingsCoinGecko · trading venuesUnavailable— N/APASS named tier-1 venue · WARN other listing · FAIL none
ⓘ Missing data stays unavailable. A real zero stays zero. Source coverage varies by chain.

PASS / WARN / FAIL are per-signal display rules, separate from the overall AI score. N/A means missing data or a check that does not apply.

WHAT NEEDS A CLOSER LOOK

Risk flags

  • Unverified contract
  • No token age data
  • No holder concentration data

Findings from the assessment. Read alongside the signal evaluations and limitations.

THE NUMBER IS A STARTING POINT

Useful context.
Your own judgement.

A risk assessment describes the signals checked at a particular time. It cannot tell you what a team will do next, how the market will move, or whether you should buy.

Build your token safety checklist ↗
01 / CONTRACT

Verified is not audited.

Public source code makes inspection possible. It does not prove the code is free of vulnerabilities, that permissions are harmless, or that funds are protected.

02 / OWNERSHIP

Wallets need context.

Raw top-10 concentration can include exchange custody wallets. It is not a measure of insider ownership, and unavailable holder data is not evidence of decentralisation.

03 / MARKET ACTIVITY

Volume is not liquidity.

Trading volume measures reported activity over 24 hours. It does not measure locked liquidity, executable pool depth or your ability to exit a position.

A LITTLE MORE CLARITY

Your questions,
answered.

Understand the result
before your next step.

Is BEAT safe to buy?

BEAT has a HIGH Rug Risk Score of 75 due to an unverified contract, which is a major safety concern. While it’s listed on multiple exchanges, unverified contracts can hide risks like hidden minting functions or backdoors. Always verify the contract before investing.

Is BEAT a scam or rug pull?

The HIGH risk score suggests potential scam indicators, particularly the unverified contract. Scams often use unverified contracts to hide malicious code. However, without further evidence, it’s not definitively a rug pull. Proceed with extreme caution.

What is BEAT's Rug Risk Score?

BEAT's Rug Risk Score is 75, classified as HIGH risk. This score is based on the unverified contract, lack of token age data, and missing holder concentration data, all of which raise transparency concerns.

Should I invest in BEAT?

Given the HIGH risk score and unverified contract, investing in BEAT is not recommended for beginners. The lack of transparency increases the chance of losing your investment. This is data analysis only, not financial advice.

How does StableHub score BEAT?

StableHub scores BEAT based on five key signals: contract verification, token age, liquidity, holder concentration, and exchange listings. BEAT scores poorly on contract verification and missing data, which heavily influence the HIGH risk score.

ANOTHER TOKEN ON YOUR MIND?

Check another token.

No wallet connection. Just a public contract address.

Check a token ↗Join Telegram ↗

Explore StableHub

Manage cookies
Scroll to Top